Get a Free Case Evaluation. No Fee Unless We Win. Call or Text 503-222-6333

New Jersey Supreme Court Denies Class Action Status in Vioxx Litigation

Interesting development in the ongoing Vioxx litigation against Merck.

The plaintiff in the New Jersey case was a union whose health-care plan spent $200,000 on Vioxx prescriptions for its members and now seeks reimbursement from Merck following the withdrawal of the medicine three years ago. Two lower courts had ruled the union could join forces in a class action with other health-care plans and insurers seeking as much as $15 billion in reimbursement from Merck.

However, in a 5-0 ruling, New Jersey’s highest court found the plaintiffs are not entitled to a class action under New Jersey’s Consumer Fraud Act. The ruling bolstered Merck’s view that each Vioxx lawsuit contains a different set of facts and must be considered separately. 

Read more about the ruling here and here.

About the <span>Author</span>

About the Author

Tom D'Amore is the founder of D'Amore Law Group and a trial attorney with over 30 years of experience representing injured people and their families across the West Coast, securing more than $325 million in recoveries. He handles cases involving car accidents, trucking accidents, construction injuries, medical malpractice, and sexual abuse. Licensed in Oregon, Washington, and California, Tom is the only NBTA board-certified truck accident attorney in Oregon. He is a national Board of Governors member, past Executive Committee member, and past Budget and Audit Chair of the American Association for Justice, as well as past President of the Oregon Trial Lawyers Association and an Eagle member of the Washington State Association for Justice.
Contact Us
I accept the Terms
I accept the Terms