GET A FREE CASE EVALUATION. NO FEE UNLESS WE WIN.
Call or Text Us 503-222-6333

Corporate elder care that won’t let patients out

This blog post was first published on legalexaminer.com

Understaffed, under-regulated assisted living facilities have been caught using dangerous processes to meet residency goals.

See more from FRONTLINE.

The facility was dangerously understaffed, and went to great lengths to cover up Mrs. Boice’s serious bed sores for months instead of sending her to a hospital.

Her family sued, using the court to expose the corporation’s dangerous policies.

This ProPublica and Frontline collaboration explored the operations of Emeritus, one of the country’s largest assisted living companies. Their investigation uncovered details of a disturbing company policy that resulted in the neglect and in some instances, the death of Emeritus residents like Mrs. Boice.

What are assisted living facilities?

Originally established as an alternative to traditional nursing homes, assisted living facilities are targeted at those who can no longer live on their own, but who don’t need intensive medical care.

More than 3 decades after the first facility opened, there are still no consistent federal standards for assisted living facilities.

A lack of federal oversight has led some states to draw up their own laws to protect seniors in assisted living. For example, in California, elderly persons who require serious medical treatment – like those with severe bedsores– are required to be transferred to a hospital or nursing home.

Nurses … or salespeople?

A few years ago, potential investors were looking closely at Emeritus. The company’s directors wanted to make Emeritus look more profitable to the investors. They implemented a new company goal: pack the facilities full. Do it as quickly as possible.

To meet the corporate goal of 100% occupancy, Emeritus care facilities began admitting many new residents they were not staffed to care for. They admitted new elderly residents without a standard doctor’s report, or a care plan.

Bringing in new residents wasn’t enough: Emeritus wanted to keep people from leaving.

In order to meet their corporate goals, the nursing staff was told they should retain residents as long as possible. Residents who became ill or who should have been sent to a hospital, or who needed nursing home care, were stuck in assisted living facilities.

Worse, in further attempt to cut costs, nurses were replaced by unskilled workers with limited medical backgrounds.

“Emeritus was intensely focused both on persuading people to move into its buildings and dissuading them from moving out. They did not want paying customers to, as they put it, go out the back door.”

Emeritus was able their focus from patients to profit because there is no real federal oversight of multi-state corporate assisted living facilities, or even guidelines for what constitutes an assisted living facility.

Previous Blog Posts:

PORTLAND OREGON

1050 SW 6th Ave #1100
Portland, OR 97204

LAKE OSWEGO OREGON

4230 Galewood St #200
Lake Oswego, OR 97035

BEND OREGON

750 NW Charbonneau St #201
Bend, OR 97701

VANCOUVER WASHINGTON

1220 Main St #400
Vancouver, WA 98660

Accessibility Toolbar

logo